Paul turns from his own running (vv. 12-14) to the community’s imitation. Two imperatives, both present tense and both durative: γίνεσθε (become, keep becoming) and σκοπεῖτε (fix your attention on). The verse is the hinge between the autobiographical paradigm of vv. 4-14 and the warning about the ἐχθροὶ τοῦ σταυροῦ in vv. 18-19. The logic is: there are two sets of people to watch, and this is the set to watch for imitation — v. 18 supplies the set to watch out for.

Three things carry the exegetical weight. First, συμμιμηταί is a NT hapax and its σύν- prefix is genuinely ambiguous: fellow imitators with each other, or fellow imitators with Paul (both imitating Christ)? Second, the abrupt move from singular μου to plural ἡμᾶς in one sentence needs accounting for. Third, τύπον is singular against a plural pronoun, which suggests Paul is naming a single stamped shape rather than a set of individual examples.

Nothing here is textually unstable in a doctrinally significant way, but the word order of the final clause is disturbed in a handful of witnesses, and that is worth noting.

Built onobrien-nigtc · fee-nicnt · silva-becnt · bdag

A NT hapax, and rare in Greek generally — it is not in the LXX and Paul may have coined it, consistent with his habit in this letter of manufacturing σύν- compounds (σύμψυχοι 2:2, συνεργός/συστρατιώτης 2:25, συναθλέω 1:27; 4:3, σύμμορφος 3:21, συγκοινωνός 1:7). The base noun μιμητής is Paul’s ordinary word (1 Cor 4:16; 11:1; 1 Thess 1:6; Eph 5:1), always with a genitive naming the model. Here μου is that objective genitive: Paul is what is imitated.

The force of σύν- is where the difficulty lies.

Rendering: fellow imitators of me keeps the compound audible and leaves both readings open. ‘Join together in imitating me’ or ‘imitate me as I imitate Christ’ each closes one door.

Built onbdag · obrien-nigtc · fee-nicnt · silva-becnt · bdf

Paul wrote γίνεσθε, not ἔστε. Per the standing corpus policy on γίνομαι, the verb marks entry into a state rather than static being. Combined with the present imperative (durative, per the ποιέω policy already fixed at 2:14), the sense is an ongoing becoming: not ‘be imitators’ as a settled description but ‘keep becoming imitators.’

This is not pedantry — it matches the argument. Paul has just refused to say he has arrived (οὐχ … ἤδη τετελείωμαι, v. 12). The imitation he asks for is of a man in motion, so the imperative is aspectually appropriate: a process, not a status. Modern English cannot easily carry both the ingressive and the durative in a single phrase, so the literal tier keeps ‘be becoming’ and the smooth tier takes ‘become.’

Built onbdf · bdag · silva-becnt

Already fixed in the glossary at 2:4: fix attention on / keep in view, from σκοπός (target, watchman). Deliberate, sustained, consequential attention with a view to action — not neutral βλέπω, which is what Paul uses three times in 3:2 for the opposite operation (‘watch out for the dogs’). The verbal contrast is deliberate: βλέπετε those, σκοπεῖτε these. English should preserve the difference; rendering both ‘look at’ or both ‘watch’ erases it.

Note the target-language trap: colloquial English ‘look out for’ carries a protective sense that is not here. Paul is asking for a fixed gaze on a model, the same operation as κατὰ σκοπὸν διώκω in v. 14 (same root). The runner watches the mark; the community watches the runners.

Built onbdag · obrien-nigtc

περιπατέω in Paul is the settled ethical idiom for the conduct of a whole life, taken over from the Hebrew הָלַךְ / הֲלָכָה via the LXX (e.g. 4 Kgdms 20:3; Prov 8:20) and pervasive in Paul (Rom 6:4; 8:4; 1 Cor 7:17; Gal 5:16; Eph 4:1; Col 1:10; 1 Thess 4:1).

Whether this counts as a live or a dead metaphor is a real question. In first-century Greek the walking image was still felt enough that Paul can pun on it (Gal 5:16 ‘walk by the Spirit and you will not carry out the desires of the flesh’), and here it sits three verses after a footrace (v. 14) and just before an image of people whose end is destruction (v. 19), so the motion-vocabulary of the whole passage is coherent. Per §8, the image is retained: walk. Rendering ‘live’ or ‘conduct themselves’ flattens it and severs the link to the athletic imagery Paul has been building.

One pastoral note worth making: at 1:27 Paul used πολιτεύεσθε for the same operation, choosing the civic verb for a Roman colony. Here he reverts to his default. The variation is stylistic, not semantic, but the reader of the whole letter should be able to see both words.

Built onbdag · muraoka-lxx · obrien-nigtc · fee-nicnt

The correlative pair is the syntactic crux. οὕτω (‘in this way’) needs a referent, and καθώς supplies the standard of comparison — but which way round?

The difference is small in practical outcome but real in structure: on the first reading the Philippians are given a test to apply to third parties; on the second they are pointed to people already identifiable from Paul’s self-portrait. The rendering ‘those who walk in this way, just as you have us as a pattern’ deliberately preserves the ambiguity, since English ‘in this way … just as’ can be read either direction. The alternative ‘those whose walk matches the pattern you have in us’ closes it to the prospective reading.

On καθώς itself: BDF notes that Koine καθώς extends past pure comparison into causal and near-declarative uses, which is what makes the second reading grammatically live rather than merely possible.

Built onbdf · obrien-nigtc · silva-becnt · fee-nicnt

τύπος is from τύπτω, ‘to strike’: the mark left by a blow, hence a stamp, an impression, a die or mold, and by extension a model or pattern. The concrete sense is alive in the NT (John 20:25, the τύπος of the nails). Paul’s usage runs to model/example (Rom 6:17; 1 Thess 1:7; 2 Thess 3:9), and in Rom 5:14 to typological prefiguration.

Two details matter here.

First, the construction is ἔχετε τύπον ἡμᾶς — the double-accusative idiom already fixed at 2:29 (ἔχω + predicate accusative): ‘you hold us as a pattern.’ Per the glossary policy, the assignment structure must stay visible; hence ‘you have us as a pattern’ rather than ‘we are your example,’ which converts an assignment made by the Philippians into a claim made by Paul.

Second, τύπον is singular while ἡμᾶς is plural. Paul does not say ‘you have us as patterns.’ The singular suggests one stamped shape, of which the several persons are instances — cross-shaped, self-emptying life, the same shape as 2:5-11 and 3:10 (συμμορφιζόμενος τῷ θανάτῳ αὐτοῦ). ‘Pattern’ or ‘mold’ carries this better than ‘example,’ which is countable and individualizing. I keep pattern.

Built onbdag · obrien-nigtc · silva-becnt · bdf

Within one sentence Paul moves from singular μου to plural ἡμᾶς. This is not carelessness; the question is what the plural covers.

No rendering decision hangs on this — ἡμᾶς is ‘us’ under all three. But it changes how the verse is preached, and the second reading is the one that best explains why the plural appears exactly here, after two chapters of holding up co-workers.

Built onobrien-nigtc · fee-nicnt · silva-becnt

The verse is substantially stable across the tradition. NA28 prints it without a diamond, and it is not treated in Metzger’s Textual Commentary — a fair indication that the editors found nothing requiring discussion.

Two minor points of apparatus:

1. Word order of the final clause. Some witnesses transpose to καθὼς ἡμᾶς ἔχετε τύπον or read τύπον ἡμῖν (dative). The dative would shift the sense toward ‘a pattern for you,’ which slightly weakens the double-accusative construction; it is poorly supported and looks like a scribal easing of the somewhat compressed Greek. The critical text’s ἔχετε τύπον ἡμᾶς, with two accusatives, is the harder and better-attested reading.

2. ἡμᾶς / ἡμῖν and the general instability of ἡ-/ὑ- pronouns. Because ἡμεῖς and ὑμεῖς were homophones or near-homophones in Koine, first- and second-person plural pronouns interchange freely in the manuscripts throughout the NT. Here the sense fixes ἡμᾶς securely (the Philippians cannot be their own τύπος), so the itacistic noise carries no exegetical weight.

Neither point affects meaning. Recorded per §4 rather than passed over in silence.

Built onna28 · metzger-tc

Paul’s call to imitation is not idiosyncratic. Mimēsis of the teacher was the ordinary pedagogy of the Greco-Roman philosophical schools: Seneca tells Lucilius to choose a Cato or a Laelius and live as though watched by him (Ep. 11.9-10; 25.5-6), and the biographical vita of a philosopher functioned as curriculum, not decoration. Epictetus works the same way. In a culture without mass literacy, moral formation ran through observed lives.

This is the register Paul is writing in, and it explains why he can say what sounds intolerably self-regarding to modern ears without any embarrassment. It also constrains the reading: a τύπος in this world is something watched and reproduced, which is exactly the pairing of σκοπεῖτε with τύπον here.

What differentiates Paul is v. 12: the model has not arrived. The pattern is a man still running.

Built onobrien-nigtc · fee-nicnt · hurtado-ljc

Chrysostom, on this verse in his Homilies on Philippians (hom. 13), reads σκοπεῖτε as close, active observation and takes the point to be that Paul offers himself for scrutiny precisely because his life is available for inspection — the teacher who says ‘watch me’ has staked something. He also draws the contrast with v. 18 sharply: the same faculty of attention is directed at two sets of people with opposite results, and the church is expected to be able to tell them apart.

Theodore of Mopsuestia and Theodoret take ἡμᾶς as including Paul’s companions rather than as a bare authorial plural, which is early support for the second option under ‘The μου / ἡμᾶς shift’ above.

Ambrosiaster and the Latin tradition render τύπος as forma (Vulgate: sicut et nos habetis formam), which preserves the mold/shape sense of the Greek noun better than English ‘example’ does — worth noting for the rendering decision above.

Built onobrien-nigtc · silva-becnt

ἀδελφοί is vocative masculine plural, standing per the fixed policy as brothers, with the note that Philippi’s assembly demonstrably included women in leading roles (Euodia and Syntyche, 4:2-3, described with the same συναθλέω that Paul uses of himself in 1:27). The masculine plural is the ordinary Greek form for a mixed group; that convention is data about the language and is preserved rather than adjusted (§3).

Register: this is epistolary paraenesis, not doxology. Two crisp imperatives and a comparative clause. The English should be direct and unadorned — no liturgical cadence, no softening of the bluntness of ‘imitate me.’

Built onbdf · obrien-nigtc